In the largest Clean Water Act lawsuit settlement in history, a plastic company has agreed to pay over $50 million after illegally dumping plastic pellets into open waterways. This case is significant for two key reasons. First, monetary settlement is huge! Second, this case highlights a new era of citizen scientists taking action in their own communities using a new toolkit of techniques to collect and analyze evidence. In recent years public data like SMARTS or STEERS has provided a mechanism for citizens to research and bring allegations against industrial polluters, this case is special because citizens found tangible evidence in their communities and sought to rectify and prevent stormwater pollution.
Formosa Plastics is a manufacturer of petrochemicals and plastic nurdles. Petrochemicals are derived from refined petroleum or natural gas, once refined petrochemicals can be used to create a variety of materials and products, one of particularly high concern is plastic nurdles. Plastic nurdles, also known as pre-production plastic, are small lentil sized pellets that are melted down to make nearly all plastic products.
The facility at the heart of the lawsuit is the Calhoun County facility in Texas. The facility’s primary function is to manufacture nurdles and ship them all over the United States.
Residents of Calhoun County have felt the Formosa Plastics facility has been polluting the Lavaca Bay and nearby waterways for years. After reaching out to local, state and federal government entities citizens still felt their concerns were not being heard. In 2016, residents took matters into their own hands.
Residents of Calhoun County alleged that Formosa Plastics was seriously polluting the Lavaca Bay and nearby waterways. With the help of non profit law firms including, San Antonio Bay Estuarine Waterkeeper and other non governmental agencies, citizens began collecting data, taking photographers and recording discharges from the Texas facility.
Citizens collected water samples murky with nurdles, took photos and cataloged alleged violations in preparation of bringing a case against Formosa.
It’s important to note, citizens collected various forms of evidence for over 4 years – this is unlike any Clean Water Act violations in the past and the sheer amount of evidence contributed to large financial cost of the settlement.
The trial began and late March, with the aid of San Antonio Bay Estuarine Waterkeeper and private citizens boxes of evidence was presented to the judge. A federal judge reviewed more than 2,400 samples of plastic, as well as 110 videos and 44 photos from Lavaca Bay.
The plaintiffs alleged that the Texas Formosa manufacturing plant:
- Violated federal and state permits for over 1,000 days
- Discharged floating solids directly into waterways
- Impacted ecological life surrounding the plants leading to a significant decline in mussels, fish and other small animal life
U.S. District Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt said, “The evidence demonstrates that Formosa has been in violation of its Permit concerning the discharge of floating solids … since January 31, 2016 and that the violations are enormous,” he also described Formosa as “a serial offender.”
After months of evidence presentation and trial proceeding Formosa and the citizens entered a settlement agreement.
“The parties entered into settlement negotiations that were finalized on October 15. The agreement requires Formosa to pay $50 million over five years for mitigation efforts to “provide environmental benefits to affected areas.” Formosa must also engage engineers to design a system to halt the discharge of plastic pellets and pay more the $3 million in attorneys’ fees.”
Is it just plastic manufacturers?
In recent years, nurdles have been a hot topic. Plastic pollution is a top public concern as more and more information becomes readily available. Because nurdles are so prevalent and needed for almost everything we use in our daily lives the public concern of plastic pollution in waterways has grown.
The small size of the nurdles makes them particularly problematic – if they do end up in waterways they are so small they are almost impossible to recover.
What does it mean for your environmental compliance program?
This case is unique for many reasons, the settlement amount is of course huge! But, the amount of effort the citizens put forth to bring the allegations is extraordinary.
The biggest takeaway for managing any environmental program is – it’s no longer the public’s access to data that can lead to enormous lawsuits, something as small as a nurdle can ignite participation and citizen effort that can lead to these lawsuits. The lawsuit against Formosa took time, effort and dedication, not just a quick search on a database. In fact, we recently hosted a webinar that discusses the rise in public data surrounding environmental compliance, emerging new risks and how industrial companies can prepare for this trend.
It is important that modern manufacturers take tangible steps to lower risk and ensure facilities are fulfilling all permit requirements.
Some useful tips to preventing legal action at your facility include:
- Don’t be an easy target! Prevent illicit discharges and train all staff to ensure stormwater management is a team effort! It just takes one person not understanding or knowing and it could start a chain reaction similar to Formosa.
- Implement stormwater best practices! Have a stormwater plan easily accessible by all facility staff so everyone is on the same page and knows the requirements.
- Show you’re improving. It was only after months and years citizens took formal action against Formosa. No facility is perfect and showing improvement is an excellent way to prevent litigation and ensure all requirements are satisfied!
Learn how Mapistry’s environmental platform lowers risk by tracking all aspects of the compliance lifecycle – from inspections to reports reducing risk and ensuring stormwater and all environmental compliance. And check out our weekly webinar to learn more about the platform, register here!