Skip to main content
With the 2016 – 2017 reporting year drawing to a close on June 30th, California industrial facilities were eagerly waiting to see how their stormwater sampling results would shake out in terms of Baseline, Exceedance Response Action (ERA) Level 1 or ERA Level 2. Here at Mapistry, stormwater compliance is not a one-time thing (cough, cough consultants who prepare a SWPPP, only to leave their clients high and dry with a giant binder). As part of our active stormwater compliance platform, we are engaged throughout the reporting year with companies, especially as they work to bring their sample results down. So how did we do?

California Exceedances

Last year, about 25% of California companies under the Industrial General Permit (IGP) went into ERA Level 1 from Baseline (approximately 2,200 facilities out of 8,800 permitted facilities under the IGP in California). In our webinar with California Water Board staff, they reported about 900 of those 2,200 facilities moved into ERA Level 2. That means across California approximately 41% of facilities in Level 1 kept going and not meeting the Numeric Action Levels (NALs), which pushed them into ERA Level 2. For the 2017 – 2018 reporting year, approximately 10% of facilities under the California IGP will be in ERA Level 2.  

Mapistry Dealing With Exceedances

In the interest of transparency and to keep ourselves accountable, I ran the numbers on the facilities for which we did ERA Level 1 evaluations and reports for at the beginning of the reporting year (aka Qualified Industrial Stormwater Practitioner [QISP] services). In these Level 1 reports and evaluations, we dealt with pollutants of concern from copper and zinc, plus other metals, to Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) and Total Suspended Solids (TSS). Our customers operate businesses from wineries to trucking companies to landfills to scrap metal recyclers. This means we saw it all for pollutants and sources. In some cases, we were conducting ERA Level 1 evaluations and reports after they had collected samples during the 2016-2017 reporting, because they did not realize they were in Level 1. This put us at somewhat of a disadvantage in terms of changing or updating Best Management Practices (BMPs). Okay, enough excuses….how did we do?

Mapistry Success (or Failure) With Exceedances

Out of all our ERA Level 1 evaluations, only 27% of the facilities went into Level 2, the next (and highest) tier up in the stormwater exceedance world (Tiers are Baseline, Level 1, and Level 2). In this situation, we were well below the industry average (41%). For the facilities who also used our stormwater compliance software, which promotes active stormwater compliance, 83% of Mapistry customers in Level 1 stayed out of Level 2. In addition, as a qualifier, the facilities that did go into Level 2 are on large dirt lots and their pollutant of concern was TSS. These situations were challenging, because it is extremely difficult to control TSS in stormwater discharges coming from large open, unpaved sites with few structural, advanced BMPs. I consider our record in 2016-2017 a big success, even though I am very frustrated that we could not keep everyone out of ERA Level 2. For those who did not use our software, 35% went to Level 2. This year proved a few things for us:
  1. You want Mapistry doing your Level 1 Report (27% vs 41%):
    • With Mapistry only 27% of facilities went to Level 2
    • In California overall, 41% of facilities went to Level 2
  2. You want Mapistry doing your Level 1 and you want to use our software (83% vs 67%):
    • With Mapistry software, 83% stayed out of Level 2
    • Without Mapistry software, 67% stayed out of Level 2
  3. You want Mapistry software to not have exceedances (only 19%):
    • With Mapistry software, only 19% of our customers had exceedances in the 2016 – 2017 reporting year, which resulted in Level 1 or 2 status for ANY parameter.

What We Will Do About Exceedances

Well, what does this mean for the 2017-2018 reporting year in California? We still have a ton of work to do. There are too many companies in ERA Level 2 that are our customers. In addition, we have doubled the number of companies working with us over the past year and almost all of them are working with Mapistry, because they are in ERA Level 1 or Level 2. So, how are we going to tackle the new reporting year:
  • Increased Training Frequency – Will be rolling out our interactive, online training platform to our customers in addition to the annual in-person training sessions. This will keep sampling, BMP implementation, and inspection procedures fresh in the minds of stormwater teams.
  • Expanded Office Coverage – We expanded our geographic coverage with a new office in Los Angeles in the first half of 2017. Look for even more site visits and casual drop-ins at customer facilities to help with a pressing issue.
  • Revolutionized Stormwater Compliance Software – Our online, software platform was completely revamped in 2017 and is rolling out now in mid-July with a redesigned dashboard, predictive exceedance alerts, and expanded toolset for annual evaluations, Level 1 reports, and lab integrations.

Of the Level 1 evaluations Mapistry did, 83% stayed out of Level 2.

Only 19% of our customers had exceedances in 2016 – 2017. Our goal is 0% in 2017 – 2018.

Create more proactive and accountable teams

Learn why the world’s leading industrial companies trust Mapistry to streamline EHS compliance